Search for: All records

Abstract The Dominican Republic is experiencing increased forest loss due to the expansion of avocado farming. While agricultural lands can provide viable habitat for birds, knowledge of avian use of avocado farms relative to native forest is limited. We conducted surveys in fall 2021 to compare the bird communities and vegetation complexity of two avocado farm sites and two native dry forest sites in the northern Sierra de Bahoruco region of the Dominican Republic to assess avian habitat use. Overall, we found that habitat associations differed for bird species distinguished by contrasting geographic ranges. In particular, the abundance, richness, and diversity of bird species endemic to Hispaniola were significantly greater in forests than in farms, while non-endemic resident bird species had the opposite habitat associations. The abundance, richness, and diversity of Neotropical migrants exhibited fewer distinct differences between farm and forest sites. Vegetation structural complexity was reduced in avocado farms relative to forests and was positively associated with the abundance, richness, and diversity of endemic bird species but negatively associated with these community measures of non-endemic resident species. Collectively, our findings suggest that avocado farms could provide viable habitat for non-endemic resident and migrant bird species, but that endemic species could be negatively impacted by an increase in avocado farming in the region. We offer recommendations for forest preservation, farming practices, and future research that could help to inform the conservation of endemic species in the region. Keywords agriculture, avian conservation, Dominican Republic, endemic species, habitat use, land-use change, Neotropical migrants Resumen Uso de granjas de cultivo de aguacate y bosques nativos por parte de las aves en el norte de la Sierra de Bahoruco, República Dominica • La República Dominicana está experimentando una mayor pérdida de bosques nativos como consecuencia de la expansión de los cultivos de aguacate. Aunque las tierras agrícolas pueden proporcionar un hábitat propicio para algunas aves, el conocimiento sobre el uso que hacen de los cultivos de aguacate en comparación con las áreas forestales nativas es limitado. En otoño de 2021, realizamos muestreos en dos granjas de aguacate y dos bosques secos nativos en la región norte de la Sierra de Bahoruco (República Dominicana), y comparamos las comunidades de aves y la complejidad de la vegetación para evaluar el uso del hábitat que hacen las aves. En general, observamos diferencias entre las asociaciones de hábitats de las especies de aves con distribuciones geográficas distintas. En particular, la abundancia, riqueza y diversidad de especies de aves endémicas de La Española fueron significativamente mayores en los bosques que en las granjas; mientras que las especies de aves residentes no endémicas mostraron asociaciones de hábitat opuestas. La abundancia, riqueza y diversidad de las aves migratorias neotropicales exhibieron menos diferencias entre las granjas y los bosques. La complejidad estructural de la vegetación se redujo en las granjas de aguacate en relación con los bosques y tuvo una correlación positiva con la abundancia, riqueza y diversidad de aves endémicas, pero negativa con las mismas medidas comunitarias de especies residentes no endémicas. En conjunto, nuestros resultados sugieren que los cultivos de aguacate podrían proporcionar un hábitat adecuado para aves residentes no endémicas y migratorias; mientras que las especies endémicas podrían verse afectadas negativamente por un aumento de estos cultivos en la región. Por último, proporcionamos recomendaciones para la conservación de los bosques, prácticas agrícolas y futuras investigaciones que podrían contribuir a la conservación de las aves endémicas de esta región. Palabras clave agricultura, aves migratorias neotropicales, cambio de uso de suelo, conservación de aves, especies endémicas, República Dominicana, uso de hábitat Résumé Utilisation par les oiseaux des plantations d’avocatiers et des forêts non exploitées dans le nord de la Sierra de Bahoruco, en République dominicaine • En République dominicaine, la forêt indigène est en régression en raison de l’augmentation de la culture des avocatiers. Bien que les terres agricoles puissent fournir un habitat approprié à certains oiseaux, les connaissances sur l’utilisation des plantations d’avocatiers par rapport à celle des forêts indigènes sont limitées. Nous avons échantillonné deux plantations d’avocatiers et deux forêts sèches indigènes dans la Sierra de Bahoruco (République dominicaine) au cours de l’automne 2021, et nous avons comparé leurs communautés d’oiseaux et la complexité de leur végétation afin d’évaluer l’utilisation de ces deux habitats par les oiseaux. Dans l’ensemble, nous avons observé que les associations entre espèces d’oiseaux et habitats différaient en fonction de la répartition géographique des oiseaux. En particulier, l’abondance, la richesse et la diversité de l’avifaune endémique à Hispaniola étaient significativement plus fortes dans les forêts que dans les plantations, tandis que les espèces d’oiseaux sédentaires non endémiques étaient inversement associées à ces habitats. L’abondance, la richesse et la diversité des migrateurs néotropicaux présentaient moins de différences distinctes entre les milieux agricoles et forestiers. La complexité de la structure de la végétation était plus faible dans les plantations d’avocatiers que dans les forêts, et était positivement corrélée à l’abondance, à la richesse et à la diversité des espèces d’oiseaux endémiques, mais négativement corrélée à ces mesures pour les communautés d’espèces sédentaires non endémiques. Dans l’ensemble, nos résultats semblent indiquer que les plantations d’avocatiers pourraient constituer un habitat viable pour les espèces d’oiseaux sédentaires et migrateurs non endémiques, mais que les espèces endémiques pourraient être affectées négativement par une augmentation de ces cultures dans la région. Nous formulons des recommandations pour la préservation des forêts, les pratiques agricoles et les recherches futures qui pourraient contribuer à la conservation des espèces endémiques dans la région. Mots clés agriculture, changement d’affectation des terres, conservation de l’avifaune, espèces endémiques, migrateurs néotropicaux, République dominicaine, utilisation des habitats

 

The rapid pace of contemporary environmental change puts many species at risk, especially rare species constrained by limited capacity to adapt or migrate due to low genetic diversity and/or fitness. But the ability to acclimate can provide another way to persist through change. We compared the capacity of rareBoechera perstellata(Braun's rockcress) and widespreadB. laevigatato acclimate to change. We investigated the phenotypic plasticity of growth, biomass allocation, and leaf morphology of individuals ofB. perstellataandB. laevigatapropagated from seed collected from several populations throughout their ranges in a growth chamber experiment to assess their capacity to acclimate. Concurrently, we assessed the genetic diversity of sampled populations using 17 microsatellite loci to assess evolutionary potential. Plasticity was limited in both rareB. perstellataand widespreadB. laevigata, but differences in the plasticity of root traits between species suggest thatB. perstellatamay have less capacity to acclimate to change. In contrast to its widespread congener,B. perstellataexhibited no plasticity in response to temperature and weaker plastic responses to water availability. As expected,B. perstellataalso had lower levels of observed heterozygosity thanB. laevigataat the species level, but population‐level trends in diversity measures were inconsistent due to high heterogeneity amongB. laevigatapopulations. Overall, the ability of phenotypic plasticity to broadly explain the rarity ofB. perstellataversus commonness ofB. laevigatais limited. However, some contextual aspects of our plasticity findings compared with its relatively low genetic variability may shed light on the narrow range and habitat associations ofB. perstellataand suggest its vulnerability to climate warming due to acclimatory and evolutionary constraints.

 

Translocation is increasingly being used to supplement existing occurrences and establish new occurrences of rare plant species, but translocation success is dependent on understanding responses to habitat conditions and management. Platanthera integrilabia (white fringeless orchid) is a rare terrestrial orchid species presently found in mostly small occurrences that comprise a fraction of its historical distribution and abundance in the southeastern United States. We investigated the influence of shade and white-tailed deer herbivory, as cited concerns for this species, on the early success of its translocation from tubers as determined through measures of emergence, survival, growth, and reproduction of two cohorts. Our findings suggest that translocation from tubers could be a viable option to assist the conservation of P. integrilabia relative to its propagation from seed, but that low early emergence, survival, and flowering rates should be considered in translocation plans. Our results also indicate that translocation and ongoing habitat management should consider the potential for light availability to differentially impact distinct plant life stages and influence deer herbivory. We recommend that additional translocation studies designed to investigate the influence of site conditions on outcomes could improve the success of such efforts as well as inform the management of extant occurrences. 

Species differ dramatically in their prevalence in the natural world, with many species characterized as rare due to restricted geographic distribution, low local abundance and/or habitat specialization.

We investigated the ecoevolutionary causes and consequences of rarity with phylogenetically controlled metaanalyses of population genetic diversity, fitness and functional traits in rare and common congeneric plant species. Our syntheses included 252 rare species and 267 common congeners reported in 153 peer‐reviewed articles published from 1978 to 2020 and one manuscript in press.

Rare species have reduced population genetic diversity, depressed fitness and smaller reproductive structures than common congeners. Rare species also could suffer from inbreeding depression and reduced fertilization efficiency.

By limiting their capacity to adapt and migrate, these characteristics could influence contemporary patterns of rarity and increase the susceptibility of rare species to rapid environmental change. We recommend that future studies present more nuanced data on the extent of rarity in focal species, expose rare and common species to ecologically relevant treatments, including reciprocal transplants, and conduct quantitative genetic and population genomic analyses across a greater array of systems. This research could elucidate the processes that contribute to rarity and generate robust predictions of extinction risks under global change.

 

Understanding the ecological and evolutionary factors that influence species rarity has important theoretical and applied implications, yet the reasons why some species are rare while others are common remain unresolved. As a novel exploration of scientific knowledge, we used network analysis conceptually to visualize the foci of a comprehensive base of >800 studies on plant species rarity within the context of ecology and evolution. In doing so, we highlight existing research strengths that could substantiate novel syntheses and gaps that could inspire new research. Our results reveal strong integrated foci on population dynamics with other ecological concepts. In contrast, despite the potential for ecological and evolutionary processes to interact, few studies explored the interplay of environmental factors and microevolutionary patterns. The cellular and molecular biology, physiology, and plasticity of rare plant species within both ecological and evolutionary contexts similarly provide avenues for impactful future investigations.